Skip to main content

Power in World Politics

Different postures in the post-election world politics are being observed. Especially Obama and Trump conflict have started to affect global politics. In the Palestine territories, the United Nations Security Council on the UN Security Council resolved to abstain from the United States after vowing to veto a 37-year-old UN resolution against the illegal settlement of Israeli settlement.

Israel complains that outgoing President Obama has taken the call after the passes. Although Washington denied the allegation, Obama made clear his commitment to stop illegal settlement again. But the newly elected US President Donald Trump has appointed a hardliner as the Israeli ambassador. The Trump, however, said during his election campaign, he would remove the US embassy in Jerusalem. And after clearing the UN resolution on illegal settlement, he made it clear that after 20 years of his oath, the United Nations will re-think. The position of Obama and the Trump administration in Palestine and Israel's foreign policy is very much the opposite.

In such a conflict-prone situation, the newly elected US President Trump has indicated that the situation will change after taking charge. On Twitter, he wrote, "After January 20, the situation will be different." Though it may be thought that President Obama's decision could put Trump to a big crisis in Middle Eastern politics. Even in world politics, there can be a sort of security crisis. Now it is a matter of concern that in such a scenario, how easy it would be to get back to the position of trump responsibility.

On the other hand, we have already seen the New Year greetings of foreign heads of state Russian President Vladimir Putin. But the current US President Barack Obama dropped out of the list. In his place, the newly elected President Trump said he wishes the new year. In this way, there is a tense tension in world-wide situation in the world politics. And to mitigate this tension, whether it is enough to take the responsibility of trump or just go from any other equation, it is now a matter of universal interest. Trump will understand the responsibility of the President of the United States from Obama on January 20. But he has already praised Putin's administration several times. And in their cabinet, there are people who are close to Russia  
It is to be noted that during the election campaign Trump repeatedly said, take action against immigrants, especially Muslim immigrants. He also said that the immigrants who came from terrorism-hit Muslim states could be expelled. In view of such fear, the Obama administration has taken steps to stop the project to find youths who are struggling to fight from terrorism-hit Muslim countries. Although this administration has been running the project for a long time.

On December 30, Trump wrote on Twitter: "It's late (Putin) done a great job, I've always known him as a smart!" The Russian Embassy in Washington immediately announced the comments of Trump. On the other hand, Republican leader and Senate Armed Services Committee chairman John McCain said on December 30 that Russia must pay the cyber attack. An attack against a country is just about to fight. On December 29, the United States expelled 35 Russian detectives and took action against two Russian companies for "America's anti-alignment efforts". In response, Putin rejected US diplomats the possibility of immediate expulsion from Russia. The United States' newly elected President Trump has again doubted the 31st of the alleged US intervention in US elections through computer hacking. US intelligence agencies have complained against Russia. Based on the Russian diplomatic expulsion of Washington

In this case, Trump argued that US intelligence agencies had made mistakes earlier. They had informed Iraq that they had mass killings, on which the US forces attacked in 2003. That war brings disaster to the Middle East.

In the current situation, it is being noticed that the outgoing President and newly elected President of the United States are increasingly involved in the conflict on the Palestinian issue. Troubles tell Israel to stay 'tough' until they take their power. On the contrary, US Secretary of State John Kerry has warned Israel of not being able to solve the crisis if the settlement does not stop.

In the context of this situation, it can be assumed that there is an extreme conflict between the newly elected administration and the present administration in the United States. And if this contradictory situation is not a quick and reliable solution, there will be enough doubts in the future whether the solution will be possible at all. To maintain tolerance and stability in world politics, the current tension must be stopped now.    

Read More Article please Visit: https://www.politicalscienceview.com/ 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maulana Abdul Hamid Khan Bhashani

Abdul Hamid Khan Bhashani, shortened as Maulana Bhashani was a popular Islamic scholar and political leader in British India. He remained a rural-based politician renowned for selflessness and solidarity with the oppressed His long political tenure spanned the British colonial India, Pakistan and Bangladesh periods. Early life In 1880 Abdul Hamid Khan Bhashani was born in Dhangara village in Sirajganj, Bengal Presidency. He was the son of Sharafat Ali Khan. Between 1907 and 1909 he received religious education at the Deoband Madrasah. The association of Mahmudul Hasan (known as Shaikhul Hind) and other progressive Islamic thinkers inspired Bhasani against British imperialism. In 1909 he started teaching in a primary school at Kagmaree, Tangail. Career in independent Bangladesh Bhashani wanted to play the role of a responsible opposition. The progressive forces quickly gathered around him and strengthened his NAP with Kazi Zafar Ahmed as its General Secretary. But soon

Nationalism vs Patriotism

Nationalism vs patriotism: Do you know the difference? The term “nationalism” is usually accustomed describe two phenomena: (1) the angle that the members of a nation have after they care regarding their national identity, and (2) the actions that the members of a nation take once seeking to realize (or sustain) self-determination. (1) Raises questions on the conception of a nation (or national identity), that is commonly outlined in terms of common origin, ethnicity, or cultural ties, and specifically regarding whether or not a person’s membership in an exceedingly nation ought to be thought to be non-voluntary or voluntary. (2) Raises questions about whether or not self-determination should be understood as involving having full statehood with complete authority over domestic and affairs, or whether or not one thing less is needed. It is ancient, therefore, to tell apart nations from states — whereas a nation usually consists of associate ethnic or cultural community